The Wall Street Journal, among others, reports that al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb has kidnapped about forty people, including Americans. The Islamists are doing this in Algeria, in order to retaliate against the French, who are intervening in Mali. The location of the kidnappers and the kidnappees is far away from any immediately effective response. An Algerian security force attempted to storm the place to rescue the hostages, but was driven off.
See? This just goes to show that all the wrong kind of people have access to guns. It should therefore be a national priority to eliminate easy access to guns that can be used to shoot people. The Supreme Court said that we have a constitutional right to own guns, but there can be reasonable restrictions on gun ownership. So, the common sense solution to the problem is to let people only have the kind of guns that are incapable of shooting people.
We would all be much safer then, because terrorists would be unable to use deadly force, since they would naturally only own the kind of guns that are incapable of shooting people. Terrorists would have to content themselves with yelling. Which, you have to admit, would be better for us infidels.
Of course, psychopaths, like the ones who shot up the schools, or the one who shot up a theater, or the one who shot up an army post, or the one who shot up the University of Virginia, all would still be able figure out ways to obtain the old fashioned kind of guns that can shoot people. But we are just going to have to live with that because, as I'm sure you all know, being a dangerous psychopath is a civil right, such that attempting to restrict a psychopath from being dangerous would seriously trample on their free expression of their psychopathology.
You win some, you lose some.